W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapi@w3.org > May 2008

Re: [XHR] Comments on the latest public working draft

From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
Date: Mon, 12 May 2008 18:12:01 +0200
To: "Julian Reschke" <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Cc: "Sergiu Dumitriu" <sergiu.dumitriu@gmail.com>, public-webapi@w3.org
Message-ID: <op.ua1tybgv64w2qv@annevk-t60.oslo.opera.com>

On Mon, 12 May 2008 17:26:07 +0200, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>  
wrote:
> Anne van Kesteren wrote:
>>> - On the send algorithm, step 4 ("If stored method is GET act as if  
>>> the data argument is null"), why only GET and not HEAD, also?
>>  In order to subset HTTP as little as possible.
>
> Well, *if* you subset it, please make it in a consistent way. If the  
> subsetting applies to GET, it should also apply to HEAD.

Would it stop with HEAD or would there be more methods to consider going  
forward? If it's just HEAD I suppose we could add it, yes.


-- 
Anne van Kesteren
<http://annevankesteren.nl/>
<http://www.opera.com/>
Received on Monday, 12 May 2008 16:12:40 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 12 May 2008 16:12:40 GMT