It does not make sense to be only an object, because you can only have instances of functions and the instanceof operator requires a function on the right hand side. That ff3 thing might be a regression. 2008/3/18, Travis Leithead <travil@windows.microsoft.com>: > > >From the spec... > > 4.2.1. Interface object > > The interface object for a particular interface has an internal > [[Prototype]] object whose value is the Object prototype object. > > >> So, can infer that the interface object (lets use HTMLDocument) *is an* > Object? Or is it a Function? > > >> ("object" == typeof HTMLDocument) ? "It's an object" : ("function" == > typeof HTMLDocument) ? "It's a function" : "What is it?"; > > >> I see that browsers disagree and that FF3 B4 recently changed to be > 'object'. Leaving Opera in the wrong? > >Received on Tuesday, 18 March 2008 20:09:17 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 18 March 2008 20:09:19 GMT