- From: Steven Pemberton <steven.pemberton@cwi.nl>
- Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2008 16:18:34 +0100
- To: "Lachlan Hunt" <lachlan.hunt@lachy.id.au>
- Cc: public-webapi@w3.org
I would prefer "Implementations should ensure that they do not crash or behave erratically" if you see my point. But what I don't understand is why the spec thinks that a hostile NSResolver should be called out, or even what such a thing is. Best wishes, Steven Pemberton On Fri, 15 Feb 2008 16:07:48 +0100, Lachlan Hunt <lachlan.hunt@lachy.id.au> wrote: > Steven Pemberton wrote: >> Out only comment is regarding "1.3. Security Considerations". We are >> not convinced of the value of some of this text. For instance we are >> not sure how a UA could remain stable in the context of a NSResolver >> hanging, or indeed, what "remaining stable" means in this context. > > This has been rephrased as: > > "Implementations should ensure they do not crash or behave erratically > when facing when facing a hostile NSResolver object." > > Please see the latest version of the spec in CVS to review the changes. > http://dev.w3.org/2006/webapi/selectors-api/ > > Please let me know if you are not satisfied with this response. >
Received on Friday, 15 February 2008 15:18:41 UTC