I would prefer "Implementations should ensure that they do not crash or behave erratically" if you see my point. But what I don't understand is why the spec thinks that a hostile NSResolver should be called out, or even what such a thing is. Best wishes, Steven Pemberton On Fri, 15 Feb 2008 16:07:48 +0100, Lachlan Hunt <lachlan.hunt@lachy.id.au> wrote: > Steven Pemberton wrote: >> Out only comment is regarding "1.3. Security Considerations". We are >> not convinced of the value of some of this text. For instance we are >> not sure how a UA could remain stable in the context of a NSResolver >> hanging, or indeed, what "remaining stable" means in this context. > > This has been rephrased as: > > "Implementations should ensure they do not crash or behave erratically > when facing when facing a hostile NSResolver object." > > Please see the latest version of the spec in CVS to review the changes. > http://dev.w3.org/2006/webapi/selectors-api/ > > Please let me know if you are not satisfied with this response. >Received on Friday, 15 February 2008 15:18:41 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 15 February 2008 15:18:42 GMT