W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapi@w3.org > February 2008

Re: XHR test http://tc.labs.opera.com/apis/XMLHttpRequest/responseXML/009.htm

From: Charles McCathieNevile <chaals@opera.com>
Date: Sat, 09 Feb 2008 18:05:30 +0530
To: "Anne van Kesteren" <annevk@opera.com>
Cc: "Web API WG (public)" <public-webapi@w3.org>
Message-ID: <op.t59bxgdvwxe0ny@widsith.local>

On Sat, 09 Feb 2008 17:21:25 +0530, Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>  

> On Sat, 09 Feb 2008 12:38:16 +0100, Charles McCathieNevile  
> <chaals@opera.com> wrote:
>> I suggest we declare this test invalid, and either replace it and  
>> declare it valid only after such date as it is fixed, or simply add a  
>> new test that gets the correct file.
> Fixed.

So results before today are useless. Do we explain that anywhere?

> Some browsers still fail, but given that they all treat invalid XML  
> documents in different ways that was sort of expected.

Which ones?



Charles McCathieNevile  Opera Software, Standards Group
     je parle français -- hablo español -- jeg lærer norsk
http://my.opera.com/chaals   Try Opera 9.5: http://snapshot.opera.com
Received on Saturday, 9 February 2008 12:35:45 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Saturday, 9 February 2008 12:35:45 GMT