On Thu, 03 Apr 2008 19:04:55 +0200, Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc> wrote: > Ah, thanks, that does explain the issue. > > Though I think that if we want the web to have a .childElements NodeList > available then we have two options: > 1. Add it to the ElementTraversal spec and have SVG Tiny say that they > no longer require the full ElementTraversal spec. > 2. Add it to a separate unrelated spec, such as HTML5. > > Result 2 doesn't seem any better than 1. The end result for both is that > SVG tiny only require a certain set of properties, and with 2 we'd have > to wait some undefined amount of time before getting it into an Rec, > possibly of a spec that will have a much slower adoption rate. The result of (2) probably also means that there's both childElementCount and childElements.length to do the same. -- Simon Pieters Opera SoftwareReceived on Thursday, 3 April 2008 22:20:20 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 3 April 2008 22:20:20 GMT