On Sep 25, 2007, at 2:29 AM, Steve K Speicher wrote: > > These comments are regarding the 18-June-2007 XMLHttpRequest WD [1] > and a > bit delayed but hopefully still useful. > > 1) #conformance for "Comforming user agent", it states: > "If the user agent does not support XML (including support for > namespaces) > > the XML response entity body must (always) be null." > > Is this stating that a server responding to an XMLHttpRequest load or > such, must know if the user agent supports XML (including support for > namespaces) and respond with null or is it up to the conforming user > agent > > to decide if it supports XML and whether to always sets the response > to > null? The latter. The client determines whether the cient-side has XML support and acts accordingly. > > 2) #dependencies for "DOM", "Window", "HTTP": > I find the phrasing of: "must support some version of DOM Events and > DOM > Core " to be very confusing. Then there is a reference (normative?) > to > DOM3 Core and Events. So the "some version" really DOM Level 3 or > is DOM > Level 0 ok, as it is *some verson* of DOM? The lowest level of DOM Events would be 2, The lowest for DOM Core would be 1. In practice, DOM 2 Core may be the practical minimum. Regards, MaciejReceived on Tuesday, 25 September 2007 10:07:54 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:16:24 UTC