On Tue, 22 May 2007 03:02:08 +0200, Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au> wrote: >> And the standard W3C license for IDL files would likely make it >> impossible to start with them. If we wanted to publish IDL that >> implementors could use, we'd have to change the license. > > I saw in the list archives that that was something Charles might look > into? It was looked into and I believe it was decided to not further pursue a "better" license... -- Anne van Kesteren <http://annevankesteren.nl/> <http://www.opera.com/>Received on Tuesday, 22 May 2007 08:10:22 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:18:57 GMT