Re: Method overloading in IDL

On Tue, 22 May 2007 03:02:08 +0200, Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au>  
wrote:
>> And the standard W3C license for IDL files would likely make it
>> impossible to start with them. If we wanted to publish IDL that
>> implementors could use, we'd have to change the license.
>
> I saw in the list archives that that was something Charles might look
> into?

It was looked into and I believe it was decided to not further pursue a  
"better" license...


-- 
Anne van Kesteren
<http://annevankesteren.nl/>
<http://www.opera.com/>

Received on Tuesday, 22 May 2007 08:10:22 UTC