W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapi@w3.org > May 2007

Re: Method overloading in IDL

From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 12:42:18 +0200
To: "Cameron McCormack" <cam@mcc.id.au>, public-webapi@w3.org
Message-ID: <op.tsoaost364w2qv@annevk.hotspot.sfr.fr>

On Mon, 21 May 2007 03:33:39 +0200, Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au>  
wrote:
> Implementors that use the IDL to generate code for the implementations:
> which would you prefer?

Do implementors use the IDL directly or do they modify it before using it?  
In the latter case making the specification easier to write and read makes  
sense to me... Implementors that have ECMAScript support can also benefit  
as they can probably auto-generate more code if ECMAScript properties  
becomes part of the new IDL syntax.


-- 
Anne van Kesteren
<http://annevankesteren.nl/>
<http://www.opera.com/>
Received on Monday, 21 May 2007 10:42:46 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:18:57 GMT