W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapi@w3.org > June 2007

Re: [XHR] responseXML interfaces

From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2007 16:53:58 +0200
To: "Alexey Proskuryakov" <ap-carbon@rambler.ru>, "Web API WG (public)" <public-webapi@w3.org>
Message-ID: <op.tuk4z8vy64w2qv@annevk-t60.oslo.opera.com>

On Wed, 27 Jun 2007 16:30:46 +0200, Alexey Proskuryakov  
<ap-carbon@rambler.ru> wrote:
> On 6/27/07 5:00 PM, "Anne van Kesteren" <annevk@opera.com> wrote:
>>> Is it intentional that other interfaces are not mentioned at all? Some
>>> browsers create objects implementing HTMLDocument interface, and it is
>>> not entirely obvious how this should be done.
>>
>> The HTML 5 specification requires that HTMLDocument is implemented for
>> each object implementing the Document interface.
>
>   Currently, the XHR draft doesn't reference HTML 5, as far as I  
> understand.

Correct. That's not a problem though. HTML 5 makes this requirement on  
object implementing the Document interface. XMLHttpRequest doesn't have to  
state it again. However, I suppose we'll need to refer to HTML 5 in due  
course for things like non-same origin and document.domain.


>> Any suggestions on what we could say?
>
> I'm afraid that only have a few data points, namely, that no  
> sub-resources should be loaded, inline scripts should not be executed,  
> and XSL
> transformations shouldn't be applied.

Ok, I'll look into that.


-- 
Anne van Kesteren
<http://annevankesteren.nl/>
<http://www.opera.com/>
Received on Wednesday, 27 June 2007 14:54:32 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:18:57 GMT