Re: [XHR2] text/html and responseXML

> The author always has the option of not including <noscript> elements in
> their response, so I think the usecase is still supported.
>
> I'm a little bit worried that if we enable scripts for XHR (they are
> currently disabled in firefox) that sites would break. Though chances
> are probably pretty small. However if scripts are enabled we need to
> define exactly in which context they execute. Should they have their own
> 'window'? If not 'window.document' would not refer to their own document.
>
> / Jonas
>

Hello everyone!

I think XHR documents should be dead data. If you want it to be alive
and with a window then a frame or popup window seems much more
appropriate. And with that in mind, what features would an alive XHR
documents implement that wasn't covered by frames/popups?

If scripts are allowed, then next we might consider allowing plugins
such as flash. It'd be confusing. At least to me :-p

Niklas Åkerlund