- From: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
- Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2007 10:55:44 -0700
- To: Charles McCathieNevile <chaals@opera.com>
- Cc: Lachlan Hunt <lachlan.hunt@lachy.id.au>, public-webapi <public-webapi@w3.org>
On Jul 2, 2007, at 2:18 AM, Charles McCathieNevile wrote: > > On Thu, 28 Jun 2007 12:20:37 +0200, Lachlan Hunt > <lachlan.hunt@lachy.id.au> wrote: > >> Would others accept changing the methods to cssQuery() and >> cssQueryOne()? If this would achieve concensus, I'd be willing to >> use these names. > > Opera does not like the cssQuery names and prefers the names that > were suggested in Lachy's draft. > > I recall strong objection to names which suggested this was about > CSS in the past (but maybe it was only Anne objecting) on the basis > that this isn't about CSS but selectors. > > So, Bjoern, Maciej, do you object to closing the issue with the > names Lachy proposed in his draft, or are you just tossing in > another idea in case it gets stronger consensus? I don't have a strong objection either way, but I think the case against Lachy's original names (selectElement, etc) has been laid out more clearly than the case against cssQuery. I think selectorQuery (as suggested in follow-ups) would also be ok. Regards, Maciej
Received on Monday, 2 July 2007 17:55:55 UTC