On Mon, 26 Feb 2007 13:58:24 +0100, Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com> wrote: > I think it might be wiser to add a .responseHTML that works for HTML > documents in the future, since you can test for a new property from > script but you can't test for new behavior of an existing property. And > that could in principle have different rules for choosing the text > encoding. You would simply test if .responseXML is non-null. However, I don't really like that we get different character encoding detection schemes on a per property basis. I rather have it on a resource basis. So that responseText always uses the same decoding as responseXML, etc. -- Anne van Kesteren <http://annevankesteren.nl/> <http://www.opera.com/>Received on Monday, 26 February 2007 13:31:10 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:18:57 GMT