Anne van Kesteren schrieb: > On Sat, 17 Feb 2007 21:48:38 +0100, Julian Reschke > <julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote: >>> Section 4.2 already talks about this quite explicitly. What do you >>> want it to say? >> >> First of all, it's only the last paragraph of 4.2 which talks about >> this, so being a bit more specific would probably help. >> >> Also, I don't think the consequences of this are obvious to people who >> aren't very familiar with RFC2616, so it may make sense to spell it >> out explicitly ("You can't reset a header value unless it's in the >> above list, it will be appended instead"). > > Ok, added a note to that effect. Thanks. So what do we do with the other headers which are documented to be non-repeatable, but do not appear in that list? Best regards, JulianReceived on Sunday, 18 February 2007 10:34:09 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:18:57 GMT