Anne van Kesteren schrieb: > On Tue, 13 Feb 2007 17:11:03 +0100, Julian Reschke > <julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote: >> Yes. The problem is the spec saying "...nothing SHOULD be done...". I >> think it's better to be explicit what the implementation should do (in >> this case, ignore the method call). > > Oh, ok. It wasn't clear to me what you meant. (I thought it was a > comment about not mentioning "server".) > > Changed to: > > For security reasons the invocation SHOULD be ignored > if the header argument matches one of the following > headers case-insensitively: Yes. Much better. Best regards, JulianReceived on Tuesday, 13 February 2007 16:40:38 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:18:57 GMT