On Tue, 13 Feb 2007 17:11:03 +0100, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote: > Yes. The problem is the spec saying "...nothing SHOULD be done...". I > think it's better to be explicit what the implementation should do (in > this case, ignore the method call). Oh, ok. It wasn't clear to me what you meant. (I thought it was a comment about not mentioning "server".) Changed to: For security reasons the invocation SHOULD be ignored if the header argument matches one of the following headers case-insensitively: -- Anne van Kesteren <http://annevankesteren.nl/> <http://www.opera.com/>Received on Tuesday, 13 February 2007 16:27:28 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:18:57 GMT