On 2007-02-06 14:07, Christophe Jolif wrote: > Charles McCathieNevile wrote: >> Not having heard strong objections, and having had support for >> getElementsBySelector() that is at least as strong as anything else, I >> think (with my chair's hat) this can be taken as the current >> resolution of the naming debate. >> >> Which would also resolve ISSUE-110. >> >> Any objections? > > +1 Why? Because dojo has a method with a different name (not very similar in my opinion) that does something completely different? -- David HåsätherReceived on Tuesday, 6 February 2007 13:38:46 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:18:57 GMT