- From: Innovimax SARL <innovimax@gmail.com>
- Date: Sat, 4 Aug 2007 11:16:27 +0200
- To: "Anne van Kesteren" <annevk@opera.com>
- Cc: public-webapi@w3.org
- Message-ID: <546c6c1c0708040216h30b711e3sec0904ef9965e465@mail.gmail.com>
On 8/3/07, Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com> wrote: > > On Thu, 02 Aug 2007 22:23:58 +0200, Innovimax SARL <innovimax@gmail.com> > wrote: > > [[ > > * Return all the HTTP headers, as a single string, with each header > > line separated by a U+000D CR U+000A LF pair excluding the status > > line. > > ]] > > Why is this CR LF ? isn't LF sufficient ? > > That's what XMLHttpRequest level 1 said. And that's what's implemented. On 8/3/07, Marcin Hanclik <Marcin.Hanclik@access-company.com> wrote:>>Why is this CR LF ? isn't LF sufficient ? > CRLF is mandatory on HTTP level. We avoid conversion and keep the solution coherent with lower layer. > Marcin Oups, damn right ! Forgot that point. > == > > In "7. If charset is "null" let charset be UTF-8." > > > > UTF-8 should appear in orange > > That would be inconsistent with the rest of the draft. Not sure to fully understand also... I thought that it was '<q>UTF-8</q> ' (between quotes) or 'UTF-8' (in orange), but not UTF-8 (without quote nor color) ? Mohamed -- Innovimax SARL Consulting, Training & XML Development 9, impasse des Orteaux 75020 Paris Tel : +33 9 52 475787 Fax : +33 1 4356 1746 http://www.innovimax.fr RCS Paris 488.018.631 SARL au capital de 10.000 €
Received on Saturday, 4 August 2007 09:16:29 UTC