On Mon, 30 Jul 2007 20:45:36 +0200, liorean <liorean@gmail.com> wrote: > I'd prefer a custom interface to that one, if using ES4 ByteArray > straight off is not an > option - though ES4 ByteArray should be implementable in ES3 engines, > so inventing a custom interface instead of backporting the ES4 one is > just adding cruft in my opinion. Based on this and similar comments in this thread I've used ByteArray. I haven't yet added any appropriate references to ES4 definitions. I suppose implementors will know where to find them meanwhile and once the specification is ready the binding specification will have addressed it in one way or another... -- Anne van Kesteren <http://annevankesteren.nl/> <http://www.opera.com/>Received on Thursday, 2 August 2007 13:15:16 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:18:58 GMT