W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapi@w3.org > August 2007

Re: [XHR2] responseBody (byte array)

From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
Date: Thu, 02 Aug 2007 15:15:02 +0200
To: liorean <liorean@gmail.com>, "Web APIs WG (public)" <public-webapi@w3.org>
Message-ID: <op.twfofcrj64w2qv@annevk-t60.oslo.opera.com>

On Mon, 30 Jul 2007 20:45:36 +0200, liorean <liorean@gmail.com> wrote:
> I'd prefer a custom interface to that one, if using ES4 ByteArray  
> straight off is not an
> option - though ES4 ByteArray should be implementable in ES3 engines,
> so inventing a custom interface instead of backporting the ES4 one is
> just adding cruft in my opinion.

Based on this and similar comments in this thread I've used ByteArray. I  
haven't yet added any appropriate references to ES4 definitions. I suppose  
implementors will know where to find them meanwhile and once the  
specification is ready the binding specification will have addressed it in  
one way or another...


-- 
Anne van Kesteren
<http://annevankesteren.nl/>
<http://www.opera.com/>
Received on Thursday, 2 August 2007 13:15:16 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:18:58 GMT