W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapi@w3.org > April 2007

Re: ISSUE-106 and ISSUE-107 required frequency

From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 08:28:26 +0200
To: "Charles McCathieNevile" <chaals@opera.com>, "Web API public" <public-webapi@w3.org>
Message-ID: <op.tq9yxonk64w2qv@id-c0020>

On Tue, 24 Apr 2007 06:36:30 +0200, Charles McCathieNevile  
<chaals@opera.com> wrote:
> Ian suggested that there should be a required frequency for progress  
> events, and there was an issue over whether anything has to fire. The  
> current draft requires that a loadstart fire, and some kind of event  
> that signals an end-condition fire, but there is no requirement that a  
> progress event fire in the middle, nor proposed frequency for this.
>
> I propose to leave the specification without further suggestions about  
> frequency, and ths close these two issues
> http://www.w3.org/2005/06/tracker/webapi/issues/106
> http://www.w3.org/2005/06/tracker/webapi/issues/107

I would suggest that you explicitly mention that when the events are  
dispatched is up to the specifications using the progress events, such as  
the hypothetical XMLHttpRequest 2, the WHATWG HTML <video> element  
proposal, etc.


-- 
Anne van Kesteren
<http://annevankesteren.nl/>
<http://www.opera.com/>
Received on Tuesday, 24 April 2007 06:28:24 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:18:57 GMT