W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapi@w3.org > September 2006

comments on Selectors API WD

From: Daniel Glazman <daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 09:50:45 +0200
Message-ID: <451CD055.6050102@disruptive-innovations.com>
To: public-webapi@w3.org

Hello,

Here are my comments on the last WD Selectors API :

1. I think the title of the document is badly chosen. The spec*
    does not offer any API on selectors themselves but, in substance,
    offers an implementation for document.getElementsBySelector().
    Since we may have in the future a real API for accessing selectors
    themselves into the CSS OM, I strongly recommend a name more
    related to the contents than it is today.

2. I think it's an error to restrict this new API to the document
    level, in particular if we have scoped stylesheets in the near
    future. I recommend extending the API to all nodes.

3. for scoped stylesheets, and if item 2 above is accepted, I recommend
    adding a boolean parameter to both matchSingl() and matchAll()
    methods saying if it's a scoped request or not. In the case of a
    scoped request, the :root pseudo-class then represents the current
    node on which the method is invoked.

4. I really hate having two different methods for matchSingle and
    matchAll, and I'd prefer a single method with a boolean indicating
    if only the first result should be retrieved or all. The result
    should always be a StaticNodeList. If the boolean is true, then the
    length of the result is <= 1, and it's unconstrained otherwise.

5. Disruptive Innovations SARL becoming a W3C member on the 1st of
    October, we are ready to help on this specification.

Best,

</Daniel>
Received on Friday, 29 September 2006 07:50:54 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:18:55 GMT