On Fri, 22 Sep 2006 16:41:12 -0000, Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu> wrote: > That doesn't answer my question above. It just shifts the burden onto > defining what "the window from which you use the constructor" means. Can you point out the problem in that definition? > Could we have a definition in terms of things defined in the ECMA > specification or something? One that would be completely unambiguous? > I'm getting pretty tired of definition-by-example, especially without an > exhaustive example set. Well, I don't like definition-by-example at all and was trying to define something that wasn't. It's not really clear to me what the problem with the definition is. -- Anne van Kesteren <http://annevankesteren.nl/> <http://www.opera.com/>Received on Friday, 22 September 2006 21:13:05 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:18:55 GMT