W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapi@w3.org > October 2006

Do we really need for an history section?

From: sureau denis <dgsureau@yahoo.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2006 01:36:22 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <20061013083622.90169.qmail@web35610.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
To: public-webapi@w3.org


There is a lot of such histories around, and they
are far more complete that this one. Seems not really
useful in a specification.

Denis Sureau, translator.

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com

Received on Friday, 13 October 2006 09:03:12 GMT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Anne van Kesteren: "Re: Do we really need for an history section?"
Previous message: Anne van Kesteren: "Re: XMLHttpRequest: Why list HTTP method names"
Next in thread: Anne van Kesteren: "Re: Do we really need for an history section?"
Reply: Anne van Kesteren: "Re: Do we really need for an history section?"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:18:56 GMT