On Tue, 21 Nov 2006 09:55:01 +0100, Alexey Proskuryakov <ap-carbon@rambler.ru> wrote: >> I'm fine with always serializing to UTF-8 if that's what browsers do. >> One less character encoding issue for authors to deal with. :-) > > There's one difference between WebKit and Firefox in this regard, > however. WebKit serializes the document without any XML declaration, > so encoding as > UTF-8 is only natural. However, Firefox includes a declaration, with an > encoding that doesn't match the actual one - which looks like a bug to > me. Yeah, sounds like it. My suggestion would be to require that the XML Declaration be dropped. Or, if present, is set to UTF-8 (which is the encoding anyway). > Perhaps, the requrement could be that the document should be encoded to > be valid - i.e. if an XML declaration is present, it should match > the actual encoding? That's what the specification currently says. :-) What do you want? -- Anne van Kesteren <http://annevankesteren.nl/> <http://www.opera.com/>Received on Friday, 24 November 2006 11:14:33 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:18:56 GMT