- From: Brad Fults <bfults@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 16:57:51 -0700
- To: "Jim Ley" <jim@jibbering.com>
- Cc: "Web APIs WG (public)" <public-webapi@w3.org>
On 5/15/06, Jim Ley <jim@jibbering.com> wrote: > I don't agree on a "whitelist" that everyone can agree on supporting, since > if we put CHICKENS on a whitelist and a UA decides that is actually insecure > and blocks it, it should be free to do so, so the whitelist will give us > nothing, simply SHOULD support any VERB, and you're free to block any you > want for security reasons is a much more sensible policy than a non > mandatory whitelist. +1 for "SHOULD support any VERB" with specific notations about currently blacklisted verbs. -- Brad Fults NeatBox
Received on Monday, 15 May 2006 23:58:01 UTC