W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapi@w3.org > May 2006

Re: Extension HTTP methods

From: Brad Fults <bfults@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 16:57:51 -0700
Message-ID: <1959130b0605151657nb635ffavf9693157b5e2f095@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Jim Ley" <jim@jibbering.com>
Cc: "Web APIs WG (public)" <public-webapi@w3.org>

On 5/15/06, Jim Ley <jim@jibbering.com> wrote:
> I don't agree on a "whitelist" that everyone can agree on supporting, since
> if we put CHICKENS on a whitelist and a UA decides that is actually insecure
> and blocks it, it should be free to do so, so the whitelist will give us
> nothing, simply SHOULD support any VERB, and you're free to block any you
> want for security reasons is a much more sensible policy than a non
> mandatory whitelist.

+1 for "SHOULD support any VERB" with specific notations about
currently blacklisted verbs.

-- 
Brad Fults
NeatBox
Received on Monday, 15 May 2006 23:58:01 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:18:55 GMT