W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapi@w3.org > May 2006

Re: XHR constructor example

From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
Date: Sun, 14 May 2006 14:51:17 +0200
To: "Ian Hickson" <ian@hixie.ch>
Cc: "Daniel Schierbeck" <daniel.schierbeck@gmail.com>, "Web APIs WG (public)" <public-webapi@w3.org>
Message-ID: <op.s9jknrem64w2qv@id-c0020.oslo.opera.com>

On Sun, 14 May 2006 14:05:57 +0200, Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> wrote:
>>>   var request = new XMLHttpRequest();
>>
>> Given that it doesn't have to be a request I think 'r' is saver or
>> perhaps just 'x'...
>
> Please don't use single letter variable names for anything but loop index
> variables (in languages that require those), it's generally considerd
> quite bad practice.

Sure, give a me a sensible suggestion and I'll take it. Given recent  
discussions (you can post as well as retrieve) I'm not sure the original  
suggestion `var request` makes sense.


-- 
Anne van Kesteren
<http://annevankesteren.nl/>
<http://www.opera.com/>
Received on Sunday, 14 May 2006 12:51:26 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:18:55 GMT