W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapi@w3.org > May 2006

Re: Indicating XHR conformance

From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 13:32:27 +0200
To: "Mark Nottingham" <mnot@yahoo-inc.com>
Cc: "Web APIs WG (public)" <public-webapi@w3.org>
Message-ID: <op.s9froddb64w2qv@id-c0020.oslo.opera.com>

On Wed, 10 May 2006 17:30:50 +0200, Mark Nottingham <mnot@yahoo-inc.com>  
> I'm wondering if it would be useful to have some optional flags in  
> implementations that developers can use to test for. While many JS  
> features can be tested for by testing a property, this isn't so for XHR;  
> e.g., you can't easily test to see if it supports more than GET and  
> POST, for example, or if the cache is correctly implemented.
> [...]

hasFeature() didn't work out, this won't work out either. Basically most  
versioning proposals don't work out :-)

Anne van Kesteren
Received on Friday, 12 May 2006 11:32:45 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:16:21 UTC