- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 12:08:52 +0000 (UTC)
- To: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
- Cc: Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>, Web APIs WG <public-webapi@w3.org>
On Tue, 9 May 2006, Bjoern Hoehrmann wrote: > > I'm not sure why dblclick.detail == click.detail would be better than > dblclick.detail == 2 or dblclick.detail == some undefined value though. It's better than "some undefined value" because "some undefined value" is actually "a very specific value in some UA or other", which some big Web page will end up relying on, and which will cause all other UAs to have to do as well, and then we'll have to update the spec, and... As I see it the options are associated click.detail 2 0 The only advantage I can see to doing the first one is that you can pass the click and dblclick events to the same handler and hanve the handler know whether it has seen that particular set of click events before. If we decide to set it to a constant, it doesn't matter what the constant is, since it's a constant. -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Wednesday, 10 May 2006 12:08:59 UTC