Re: Updated Window draft

On Mar 20, 2006, at 09:56, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
> On Mar 20, 2006, at 1:14 AM, Ian Davis wrote:
>
>> This is looking good. Can you change the naming to be consistent  
>> with the version I added? I used ED prefix to denote an editors  
>> draft followed by the short name and date. I think this one should  
>> be called ED-window-20060320
>
> I think we should only give special names to drafts that are  
> specifically published, like Working Drafts. It would be a huge  
> hassle to rename the source document every time I commit a change.  
> And I don't think any other spec does that. At least all the other  
> Web API specs have vanilla names for their source files and  
> published html.

For WDs this is done by the Webmaster, I agree that we don't need to  
do that for EDs.

-- 
Robin Berjon
    Senior Research Scientist
    Expway, http://expway.com/

Received on Tuesday, 21 March 2006 13:28:16 UTC