On Feb 10, 2006, at 00:17, Ian Hickson wrote: > It may be worth considering that if the editor of the specification > can't > get the XPath expressions in the examples correct, it is very > likely that > authors of content using the specification will have even more > troubles. If you want the internal details, I was playing with just how much I was thinking of subsetting and kept changing my mind. I knew the XPath wasn't correct, I was just etching. I forgot to fix it later. Big deal. > Maybe using XPath for this purpose is not the optimal choice? XPath may or may not have design flaws. Personally I like it. I am not aware of any other general-purpose addressing mechanism available to W3C specifications anyway, so I don't see what else could be used anyway. -- Robin Berjon Senior Research Scientist Expway, http://expway.com/Received on Friday, 10 February 2006 09:04:31 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:18:53 GMT