On Wed, 02 Aug 2006 19:18:16 +0200, Subbu Allamaraju <subbu.allamaraju@gmail.com> wrote: > True. Since the XHR spec is not really concerned about if and how > applications write/code to empty headers, it does not make sense to > require that this method return empty string. I think the semantics of a > single > getResponseHeader() could include the cases of both non-existent headers > as well as header with an empty value. But the current definition > prevents > this, prompting for methods isResponseHeaderPresent(), which IMO, would > not be required if the semantics are changed to return null. They are changed. -- Anne van Kesteren <http://annevankesteren.nl/> <http://www.opera.com/>Received on Thursday, 10 August 2006 09:33:44 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:18:55 GMT