W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapi@w3.org > August 2006

Re: XMLHttpRequest conformance comments

From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 11:33:29 +0200
To: "Subbu Allamaraju" <subbu.allamaraju@gmail.com>
Cc: "Web APIs WG (public)" <public-webapi@w3.org>
Message-ID: <op.td1953gc64w2qv@id-c0020.oslo.opera.com>

On Wed, 02 Aug 2006 19:18:16 +0200, Subbu Allamaraju  
<subbu.allamaraju@gmail.com> wrote:
> True. Since the XHR spec is not really concerned about if and how
> applications write/code to empty headers, it does not make sense to  
> require that this method return empty string. I think the semantics of a  
> single
> getResponseHeader() could include the cases of both non-existent headers  
> as well as header with an empty value. But the current definition  
> prevents
> this, prompting for methods isResponseHeaderPresent(), which IMO, would  
> not be required if the semantics are changed to return null.

They are changed.

Anne van Kesteren
Received on Thursday, 10 August 2006 09:33:44 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:16:21 UTC