On Wed, 26 Apr 2006 07:12:59 +0200, Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> wrote: >> [...] > > There's a big difference between example pages claiming that authors > should set the type="" attribute to text/xsl, and servers actually using > that MIME type in their Content-Type headers, let along in the > Content-Type headers of content used from XMLHttpRequest. Sure, as I pointed out for text/xsl in http://www.w3.org/mid/op.s8ihwrtt64w2qv@id-c0020.lan ... > I'd recomend only looking at text/xml, application/xml, and */*+xml. But also others as suggested in http://www.w3.org/mid/Pine.LNX.4.62.0604260515341.21459@dhalsim.dreamhost.com and in http://www.w3.org/mid/Pine.LNX.4.62.0604260530490.21459@dhalsim.dreamhost.com ..? I like the text/html suggestion for a bit. -- Anne van Kesteren <http://annevankesteren.nl/> <http://www.opera.com/>Received on Wednesday, 26 April 2006 07:56:21 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:18:55 GMT