On Sat, 22 Apr 2006, Maciej Stachowiak wrote: > > In this case, an example of a spec using non-uppercase http method > names, or of a server requiring such, would demonstrate the need for the > feature. Anne demonstrated the need to uppercase 'get' and 'post' by > showing widely deployed JS libraries depending on this behavior. So far > no one has has made a similar demonstration of the benefits of not > uppercasing 'foobar'. I welcome such research and would gladly change my > tune based on the results. > > That being said, whether all methods are uppercased or only the methods > that get significant use, is not really a major issue. But let's not > just casually increase spec complexity without doing our due diligence. Again, hear hear. -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'Received on Wednesday, 26 April 2006 05:06:40 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:18:55 GMT