W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapi@w3.org > April 2006

Re: ISSUE-43: change to "common baseline"?

From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2006 13:00:31 +0200
To: "Bjoern Hoehrmann" <derhoermi@gmx.net>, "Jonas Sicking" <jonas@sicking.cc>
Cc: "Web APIs WG (public)" <public-webapi@w3.org>
Message-ID: <op.s8id65gc64w2qv@id-c0020.lan>

On Mon, 20 Mar 2006 16:30:31 +0100, Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>  
wrote:
>> What we could do is to say that this is compatible with having
>> XMLHttpRequest be an EventTarget. And that this is how they are intended
>> to be in a future revision of the spec. This way implementations can
>> implement it this way right away.
>
> This wouldn't really be different from making XHR an EventTarget right
> away and recommend that authors just use .onreadystatechange where com-
> patibility with legacy implementations is a concern.

I agree. What are the issues with XHR being an EventTarget?


-- 
Anne van Kesteren
<http://annevankesteren.nl/>
<http://www.opera.com/>
Received on Monday, 24 April 2006 11:00:38 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:18:54 GMT