W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapi@w3.org > April 2006

Re: [comment] XMLHttpRequest Object - Address Extensibility

From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2006 12:33:31 +0200
To: "Bjoern Hoehrmann" <derhoermi@gmx.net>, "Maciej Stachowiak" <mjs@apple.com>
Cc: "Web APIs WG (public)" <public-webapi@w3.org>
Message-ID: <op.s8icx5pg64w2qv@id-c0020.lan>

On Sun, 23 Apr 2006 22:52:33 +0200, Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>  
>> None of the existing vendor extensions to XMLHttpRequest follow the
>> vendor prefix naming convention. So far as I know, every major
>> implementation has at least one extension relative to the current
>> proposed spec. Therefore, requiring a vendor prefix would put all
>> existing implementations out of compliance.
> I don't think anyone proposed that. This is a matter of new extensions.

Indeed. Much like UAs MUST NOT introduce new events in the "null  
namespace" per the new DOM3EV (it might not say that right now, I'm not  

Anne van Kesteren
Received on Monday, 24 April 2006 10:55:21 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:16:21 UTC