W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapi@w3.org > April 2006

Re: [comment] XMLHttpRequest Object - Address Extensibility

From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
Date: Sun, 23 Apr 2006 22:11:04 +0200
To: "Brad Fults" <bfults@gmail.com>
Cc: "Web APIs WG (public)" <public-webapi@w3.org>
Message-ID: <op.s8g8qdlz64w2qv@id-c0020.lan>

On Sun, 23 Apr 2006 20:08:48 +0200, Brad Fults <bfults@gmail.com> wrote:
> In case you didn't pick up on it, that example was modeled largely
> after the various |opacity| implementations. So this assumption isn't
> a very far stretch, as it has already happened in the past.

I'm not sure what you mean by citing this example. I think it's actually a  
perfect example of why you'd want UA extensions prefixed. See for example:

   https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=93156#c0


-- 
Anne van Kesteren
<http://annevankesteren.nl/>
<http://www.opera.com/>
Received on Sunday, 23 April 2006 20:11:24 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:18:54 GMT