+1 - makes sense. On 2006/04/22, at 5:02 PM, Maciej Stachowiak wrote: > Current implementations silently ignore the body in this case. It > seems like a bad idea to change this to raising an exception, since > it could break existing content that blindly sets a body. But it > seems ok to change the requirement to require ignoring the body for > a specific list of methods, instead of allowing it only for a > specific list of methods, so long as this would not allow security > holes or violations of the http spec. -- Mark Nottingham mnot@yahoo-inc.comReceived on Sunday, 23 April 2006 01:40:49 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:18:54 GMT