W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapi@w3.org > April 2006

Re: ISSUE-60: Should Window Object 1.0 include access to frames by name (window.frames)?

From: Brad Fults <bfults@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2006 10:31:48 -0700
Message-ID: <1959130b0604121031q2885c1ebx86c26f45aefa8d1@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Anne van Kesteren" <annevk@opera.com>
Cc: "Web APIs WG (public)" <public-webapi@w3.org>

On 4/6/06, Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com> wrote:
> I think it makes sense to have it.

Agreed. Even more so because it's the only reliable way to access
iframe content in a document (everyone seems to disagree about a
DOM-centric way[1]).

This should definitely be specified along with the Window 1.0 spec.

[1] - http://xkr.us/articles/dom/iframe-document/

--
Brad Fults
NeatBox
Received on Wednesday, 12 April 2006 17:31:57 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:18:54 GMT