- From: Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2006 15:45:27 +0900
- To: public-webapi@w3.org
Hi,
This is a QA Review comment for "The XMLHttpRequest Object"
http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-XMLHttpRequest-20060405/
Wed, 05 Apr 2006 17:02:33 GMT
First WD
[[[
2. Conformance
This section is normative
The key words MUST, MUST NOT, REQUIRED, SHALL, SHALL NOT, SHOULD,
SHOULD NOT, RECOMMENDED, MAY, and OPTIONAL in this document are to be
interpreted as described in RFC 2119 [RFC2119].
]]]
-- The XMLHttpRequest Object
http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-XMLHttpRequest-20060405/#conformance
Wed, 05 Apr 2006 17:02:33 GMT
Good there is a conformance section in your document but which is a
bit dry, maybe once you have defined your class of products, you
could define what does that mean to be conformant to XMLHttpRequest.
For example,
if one class of product is a "user agent with a scripting engine", to
reach "basic conformance" would mean that all MUST have to be
implemented, and for "full conformance", All MUST and SHOULD have to
be implemented.
This is just an example, The WG would have to define its own
conformance model.
--
Karl Dubost - http://www.w3.org/People/karl/
W3C Conformance Manager, QA Activity Lead
QA Weblog - http://www.w3.org/QA/
*** Be Strict To Be Cool ***
Received on Wednesday, 12 April 2006 06:45:43 UTC