W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapi@w3.org > April 2006

RESOLUTION? Re: ISSUE-59: Should Window 1.0 include history?

From: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2006 17:51:00 -0700
Message-Id: <611B9377-40E9-41D9-BD0C-01C81BFD0B89@apple.com>
To: Web APIs WG <public-webapi@w3.org>

On Apr 3, 2006, at 4:18 PM, Web APIs Issue Tracker wrote:

> ISSUE-59: Should Window 1.0 include history?
> http://www.w3.org/2005/06/tracker/webapi/issues/59
> Raised by: Maciej Stachowiak
> On product: Window
> Should the Window Object 1.0 specification cover the window.history  
> object, in addition to the current
> planned scope? I think this may be necessary to give a sensible and  
> testable specification for the Location
> object. And it will also simplify the definition of browsing  
> context and allow it to match what Web Apps
> 1.0 says better.
> This affects the scope of the spec and planned interfaces so it is  
> an important issue to resolve to get the
> spec "feature complete".

It sounds like there is consensus that History should be added, so  
I'll take that as the resolution and close the issue unless there are  
objections within a few days.

Received on Friday, 7 April 2006 00:51:13 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:18:54 GMT