Anne van Kesteren wrote: > > On Wed, 05 Apr 2006 22:56:28 +0200, Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc> wrote: >> If that is indeed true we need to fix it I agree. Is there a sensible >> value we could set .status to for example? > > Lets keep .status an HTTP status code. What about dispatching an abort > event on the object as I suggested? Not sure if that's appropriate for > this version though... We have already talked about setting .status to -1 in some error conditions. Aborting is arguably an error condition. / JonasReceived on Thursday, 6 April 2006 09:28:21 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:18:54 GMT