Re: ISSUE-66: should Documents that aren't being presented be required to have a null defaultView?

On Thu, 06 Apr 2006 01:47:45 +0200, Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> wrote:
> Um, well, every browser I've tested already does it, and given the kind  
> of stuff that DocumentWindow has (.location, .cookie, .execCommand,  
> etc), all of which has to be neutered for these non-Windowed Documents,  
> it seems
> easiest to just remove the relevant members.

http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/REC-DOM-Level-2-HTML-20030109/html.html#ID-8747038  
says .cookie is on HTMLDocument... (As Björn pointed out earlier today on  
IRC.)


-- 
Anne van Kesteren
<http://annevankesteren.nl/>
<http://www.opera.com/>

Received on Thursday, 6 April 2006 00:18:50 UTC