W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapi@w3.org > April 2006

Re: ISSUE-66: should Documents that aren't being presented be required to have a null defaultView?

From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
Date: Thu, 06 Apr 2006 02:17:44 +0200
To: "Web APIs WG (public)" <public-webapi@w3.org>
Message-ID: <op.s7j8fuuo64w2qv@id-c0020.oslo.opera.com>

On Thu, 06 Apr 2006 01:47:45 +0200, Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> wrote:
> Um, well, every browser I've tested already does it, and given the kind  
> of stuff that DocumentWindow has (.location, .cookie, .execCommand,  
> etc), all of which has to be neutered for these non-Windowed Documents,  
> it seems
> easiest to just remove the relevant members.

http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/REC-DOM-Level-2-HTML-20030109/html.html#ID-8747038  
says .cookie is on HTMLDocument... (As Björn pointed out earlier today on  
IRC.)


-- 
Anne van Kesteren
<http://annevankesteren.nl/>
<http://www.opera.com/>
Received on Thursday, 6 April 2006 00:18:50 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:18:54 GMT