W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapi@w3.org > April 2006

ISSUE-60: Should Window Object 1.0 include access to frames by name (window.frames)?

From: Web APIs Issue Tracker <dean+cgi@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 4 Apr 2006 00:33:07 +0000 (GMT)
To: public-webapi@w3.org
Message-Id: <20060404003307.A10F447B90@mojo.w3.org>



ISSUE-60: Should Window Object 1.0 include access to frames by name (window.frames)?

http://www.w3.org/2005/06/tracker/webapi/issues/60

Raised by:  Everyone
On product: All

The spec for window.name can be made more clear and useful if we also specify access to frames by name 
based on the "name" property of each window. Should we add this to version 1.0 of the spec?

Received on Tuesday, 4 April 2006 00:33:16 GMT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Web APIs Issue Tracker: "ISSUE-61: Should the Window spec drop any conformance requirements for AbstractViews besides the defaultView?"
Previous message: Maciej Stachowiak: "Re: ISSUE-59: Should Window 1.0 include history?"
Next in thread: Anne van Kesteren: "Re: ISSUE-60: Should Window Object 1.0 include access to frames by name (window.frames)?"
Reply: Anne van Kesteren: "Re: ISSUE-60: Should Window Object 1.0 include access to frames by name (window.frames)?"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:18:54 GMT