W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapi@w3.org > April 2006

Re: ISSUE-59: Should Window 1.0 include history?

From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
Date: Tue, 4 Apr 2006 00:06:28 +0000 (UTC)
To: Web APIs WG <public-webapi@w3.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.62.0604032334490.21459@dhalsim.dreamhost.com>

On Mon, 3 Apr 2006, Web APIs Issue Tracker wrote:
> 
> Should the Window Object 1.0 specification cover the window.history 
> object, in addition to the current planned scope? I think this may be 
> necessary to give a sensible and testable specification for the Location 
> object.

If it contains document.location/window.location it should definitely also 
have window.history. The two are tightly related. If it doesn't have 
window.history it shouldn't have document.location.

-- 
Ian Hickson               U+1047E                )\._.,--....,'``.    fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/       U+263A                /,   _.. \   _\  ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer.   `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Tuesday, 4 April 2006 00:06:47 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:18:54 GMT