W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-web-security@w3.org > July 2011

RE: Comment

From: Hill, Brad <bhill@paypal-inc.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2011 12:39:11 -0600
To: Ariel Silverstone <asilverstone@expedia.com>, "public-web-security@w3.org" <public-web-security@w3.org>
Message-ID: <213E0EC97FE58F469BB618245B3118BB550C1B369B@DEN-MEXMS-001.corp.ebay.com>
This list is pretty wide-ranging in its topics and I don't want to discourage that, but what's currently in the draft WG charter isn't anything user-facing, only policies for consumption by user agents.

Are you thinking of presentation for something like Mozilla's Configurable Security Policies?  (Also known as "CAPS", not the colliding acronym possibility of CSP)



From: Ariel Silverstone [mailto:asilverstone@expedia.com]
Sent: Wednesday, July 06, 2011 11:23 AM
To: Hill, Brad; public-web-security@w3.org
Subject: RE: Comment

Hi Brad,

What I meant is that I see a policy about applications and their proper security  policies.  What I think is missing is guidance on presentation of certain data, fields, and perhaps certain content and images, as well.

Thank you,


From: Hill, Brad [mailto:bhill@paypal-inc.com]
Sent: Friday, July 01, 2011 8:41 AM
To: Ariel Silverstone; public-web-security@w3.org
Subject: RE: Comment


   I'm afraid I'm not quite sure what you mean by this.  Can you clarify a bit, perhaps with an example?


Brad Hill

From: public-web-security-request@w3.org [mailto:public-web-security-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Ariel Silverstone
Sent: Wednesday, June 29, 2011 12:44 PM
To: public-web-security@w3.org
Subject: Comment

One thing that I think we need to include in "Deliverables" is a presentation policy, as a distinct and separate deliverable from the deliverable for applications.

What do you think?

Thank you,


(image/png attachment: image001.png)

Received on Wednesday, 6 July 2011 18:39:41 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:26:19 UTC