- From: Brandon Sterne <bsterne@mozilla.com>
- Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2011 17:18:39 -0800
- To: Adam Barth <w3c@adambarth.com>
- CC: Daniel Veditz <dveditz@mozilla.com>, "sird@rckc.at" <sird@rckc.at>, public-web-security@w3.org
Hey Adam, I see your comments suggesting this change and Collin's supporting them. I don't see how you got from there to "this group". I'm not saying the suggested change is without merit, but there is a case to be made against it which Dan brought up. I think the debate is still open. Best, Brandon On 02/22/2011 07:41 PM, Adam Barth wrote: > Oh, I meant this group. > > Adam > > > On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 6:24 PM, Daniel Veditz <dveditz@mozilla.com> wrote: >> I haven't seen any consensus forming on that, maybe Adam's "we" >> means webkit. >> >> On 2/22/11 1:31 AM, sird@rckc.at wrote: >>> Oh, I wasn't aware that the "default-do-noting" was really happening. >>> >>> -- Eduardo >>> >>> On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 1:16 AM, Adam Barth <w3c@adambarth.com> wrote: >>>> I don't think the situation is as tricky as you make it out to be, >>>> especially if we go the route of an empty CSP policy not implying >>>> inline script restrictions, which seems likely. >>>> >>>> Adam
Received on Thursday, 24 February 2011 01:18:06 UTC