Re: [encrypted-media-tests] Initial migration of a subset of Google tests (#3324)

Regarding the comments above:
(1)(i)(a) Yes, we could consider EventWatcher, but I do not think it is urgent
(1)(i)(b) In #3355 I have removed the event checking. I will address this comment in a later PR with a version of the test that checks events
(1)(i)(c) ack
(1)(i)(d) Whether there is an `individualization-request` exchange depends on the key system and if there is we should just proxy it to the message handler. Following that we should expect the normal message exchange.
(1)(ii)(a) I will make the stepTest mandatory
(1)(ii)(b) Yes, using promise_test might be cleaner, but I'd prefer to leave that until after our immediate deadline
(2) Agreed - again I'd prefer to leave some style items until after our immediate deadline

View on GitHub: https://github.com/w3c/web-platform-tests/pull/3324#issuecomment-235713759

Received on Wednesday, 27 July 2016 20:40:40 UTC