Re: [paint-timing]

I've added this fix to https://github.com/w3c/paint-timing/pull/27 which I
had forgotten about.

On Tue, Aug 21, 2018 at 12:15 PM Ilya Grigorik <igrigorik@google.com> wrote:

> Ah, nice catch! Thanks for reporting this.
>
> +Shubhie Panicker <panicker@google.com> fyi, a quick fix? :-)
>
> On Tue, Aug 21, 2018 at 4:22 AM 刘博文 <liubowen@360.cn> wrote:
>
>> Hello Everyone.
>>
>> in the https://w3c.github.io/paint-timing/ draft , I found an error.
>>
>> In the 1.1. Usage example section, The last line of comment code is wrong.
>>
>> var observer = new PerformanceObserver(function(list) {
>>     var perfEntries = list.getEntries();
>>     for (var i = 0; i < perfEntries.length; i++) {
>>         // Process entries        // report back for analytics and monitoring        // ...    }});
>> // register observer for long task notificationsobserver.observe({entryTypes: ["paint"]});
>>
>>
>> The comment code should be changed to the following:
>>
>> var observer = new PerformanceObserver(function(list) {
>>     var perfEntries = list.getEntries();
>>     for (var i = 0; i < perfEntries.length; i++) {
>>         // Process entries        // report back for analytics and monitoring        // ...    }});
>> // register observer for paint timing notificationsobserver.observe({entryTypes: ["paint"]});
>>
>>
>>

Received on Tuesday, 21 August 2018 16:41:34 UTC