The processing model for RAF is now defined in the html spec's processing model. I would recommend looking there and directing whoever sent that patch to that standard instead. I don't know whether this issue has been addressed there or not but suspect fixing it over there is more likely to happen. - James On Aug 4, 2015 11:26 AM, "Ms2ger" <ms2ger@gmail.com> wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 06/23/2014 09:45 PM, Boris Zbarsky wrote: > > On 6/23/14, 3:01 PM, James Robinson wrote: > >> What is the correct incantation to say "Treat this exception as > >> uncaught and continue with the algorithm" in the spec? > > > > http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#report-the-error > > > > > So can we fix this now? I just got a Servo pull request that squashed > the exception entirely because this thread has gone ignored for over a > year. > > Thanks > Ms2ger > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > > iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJVwQO/AAoJEOXgvIL+s8n2Ad0H/1TDxEhmcDcG6agwDK3IkXNr > QVJk5kb0EIXMAxob/M6Dbjot3/CRwYqE1WSnoAtIAplhN5CLNDfN/QnpMlbf7SZ9 > qMHgiEJS+zfAyXLSX5r0qQDFneCEGR6Yokf0wKbxrHkU6iDgF/qKFNYv4YQ+TULX > 2+EP91yCT7q4tnCx5i8YnOr2rN28z0Q3YE6ao6hUZQEXkSamRNE3yFFdf3R08C/f > w+voLkDZtdLjwf+DMmfgHbVS0zYKu1bLiHe1/6hzcjmJyAAGriAZ4CFBbp9zfHP+ > /9Uz8TH1TrB8DZbgBIj1S/Df3e3+i8USNvQWT6j3q5IdFpNKBh+m/Ob6MhkCN3g= > =T7oN > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- >
Received on Wednesday, 5 August 2015 06:58:21 UTC