- From: Arvind Jain <arvind@google.com>
- Date: Sat, 18 Jan 2014 14:28:06 -0800
- To: Jeffrey Gilbert <jeffreytgilbert@gmail.com>
- Cc: public-web-perf <public-web-perf@w3.org>
Received on Saturday, 18 January 2014 22:28:34 UTC
In the new version, we have addressed this use case. Please check the current draft at: https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/webperf/raw-file/tip/specs/PageVisibility2/Overview.html On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 2:30 PM, Jeffrey Gilbert <jeffreytgilbert@gmail.com>wrote: > http://www.w3.org/TR/page-visibility<http://www.w3.org/TR/page-visibility/#introduction> > / > > The scope of this spec is short sighted. It does not take into account the > scroll position of the page. Because of this, iframes which are below the > fold will still fire that they are visible when they are in fact not > visible and should not be running processes as though they were. Because of > this, I recommend adding this visibility check to the specification so that > browser vendors can enable developers to write more power friendly and > state aware applications. > > Jeffrey Gilbert > >
Received on Saturday, 18 January 2014 22:28:34 UTC