W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-web-perf@w3.org > February 2014

Re: [agenda] Web Performance WG Teleconference #125 Agenda 2014-02-12

From: Arvind Jain <arvind@google.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2014 07:28:14 -0800
Message-ID: <CAOYaDdNJL_6JOtUJmzLPbqiLh-F5y9Km7XZnTtXa6cGmLKZZBg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>
Cc: Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>, Jatinder Mann <jmann@microsoft.com>, "public-web-perf@w3.org" <public-web-perf@w3.org>
OK I've made the change. Could you take one full pass on the spec, and see
if we are good to go for LC.
 https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/webperf/raw-file/tip/specs/Beacon/Overview.html




On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 2:07 AM, Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl> wrote:

> On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 7:37 AM, Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc> wrote:
> > I think even better is
> >
> > boolean sendBeacon(DOMString url, optional (ArrayBufferView or Blob or
> > DOMString or FormData)? data = null);
> >
> > That way passing <null> as body will not send any body. With the
> > webidl in your proposal, explicitly passing <null> would send the
> > string "null" I think.
>
> That would match XMLHttpRequest. It too has the ability to send an
> empty byte string body or no body at all.
>
>
> --
> http://annevankesteren.nl/
>
Received on Thursday, 13 February 2014 15:28:43 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:04:38 UTC